One vendor or six.
Dynamic + a token vendor + an NFT vendor + an RPC provider + an agent layer is five contracts. FabricBloc is one.
FabricBloc vs Dynamic
FabricBloc vs Dynamic.
Dynamic is a wallet-as-a-service product with strong auth coverage. FabricBloc treats wallets as one capability of a full onchain stack that also issues tokens, runs NFT drops, and gives AI agents scoped access.
Wallet-as-a-Service + auth
Capability matrix.
✓ supported · partial = limited or beta · — = not currently offered. We update on public-source change; submit a correction via the link below.
| Capability | FabricBloc | Dynamic |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded non-custodial wallets | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-wallet (custom + external) | ✓ | ✓ |
| ERC-20 token issuance | ✓ | — |
| NFT drops and metadata | ✓ | — |
| Yield vaults / programmable strategies | partial | — |
| RPC included with platform key RPC nodes coming soon on FabricBloc. | partial | — |
| MCP server + scoped agent keys | ✓ | — |
| Studio for non-developers | ✓ | — |
| Single bill across the stack | ✓ | partial |
Spotted something off? Send a correction →
Why FabricBloc
Why teams choose FabricBloc beyond Dynamic.
Audit log spans the stack.
A single workspace-level audit log covers wallets, tokens, NFTs, vaults, and agent activity. SIEM streaming on Enterprise.
Other comparisons
Same scope, different vendor.
Switch from Dynamic in an afternoon.
Bring the existing integration. We map it to FabricBloc primitives and ship a working migration plan.